Difference between revisions of "Nas v2.0"
(→List of features our perfect NAS would have:) |
|||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
- Fast access. The StorCenter has, just like our current IBM, gigabit connectivity. However, the IBM tops out at around 40MB/s where we hope to get more performace out of the IOmega.<br> | - Fast access. The StorCenter has, just like our current IBM, gigabit connectivity. However, the IBM tops out at around 40MB/s where we hope to get more performace out of the IOmega.<br> | ||
- ??? Anything more?<br> | - ??? Anything more?<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Implementation == | ||
| + | |||
| + | An implementation of Freenas is chosen again to maintain an easy to use GUI which can be accessed by the intranet. Because the STORcenter does not have connectivity for an extra harddrive besides the 4 hotswap SATA's, the OS is booted from a SANdisk USB stick. Instead of a ZFS drive, there will be chosen to make a big UFS drive for storage. | ||
Revision as of 23:40, 16 February 2013
| Project: Nas v2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Featured: | |
| State | Planned |
| Members | PsychiC |
| GitHub | No GitHub project defined. Add your project here. |
| Description | Migration of NAS activity to the IOmega |
| Picture | |
| No project picture! Fill in form Picture or Upload a jpeg here | |
Due to a sudden increase of ACKspace server inventory, we aquired a nice IOmega StorCenter Pro NAS 200rL NAS. This is an 1U rackmounted enclosure for holding up to 4 SATA harddrives. The general plan is to migrate our current 2 drive IBM P4 server based NAS solution to this StorCenter. Supposedly (we haven't turned it on yet) it has a linux based OS, which has some capability for sharingfiles over a network. However, we would need to expand the featurelist by installing our own linux version (FreeNAS or other).
Upgrades:
We installed an extra 1GB of DDR ram for increased performance. The CPU is an Celeron D 352, a single core CPU with 64 bit architecture. It should be plenty of power to maintain a decent performance, but we are keeping the possibility of a dual core CPU based NAS open. The HDD connections are on-board, but there is a possibility to install an add-on board to the system. For example a (RAID) harddrive controller with PCI-E port. A proper riser-card should be inserted for this functionality.
List of features our perfect NAS would have:
- A bunch of SATA harddisks to hold all data. The Storcenter had 4 hotswap SATA bays, which is more than the current limit of 2 drives from the IBM.
- SMB shares over the network. SMB is a sharing protocol for Windows based computers, but it is widely accepted by both Linux and Mac OSes.
- Posibility to download from newsgroups. Idealy, the NAS would have an NZB drop location, which it reads periodically and starts downloading accordingly.
- Seperate (secure) share for netboot data.
- Possibly a section with mirrored data for something you don't want to loose in case of a drive failure. Mainly our NAS does not need any kind of failsafe, due to the nature of the contents, but this would be a nice add-on.
- Fast access. The StorCenter has, just like our current IBM, gigabit connectivity. However, the IBM tops out at around 40MB/s where we hope to get more performace out of the IOmega.
- ??? Anything more?
Implementation
An implementation of Freenas is chosen again to maintain an easy to use GUI which can be accessed by the intranet. Because the STORcenter does not have connectivity for an extra harddrive besides the 4 hotswap SATA's, the OS is booted from a SANdisk USB stick. Instead of a ZFS drive, there will be chosen to make a big UFS drive for storage.
